Filesatu.co.id, Denpasar – Bali | Juli Artiningsih’s Divorce Lawsuit Trial is the ninth time (9) and has not yet ended, this time the male witnesses Justin Artiningsih husband were present, the Talak divorce case trial was again held at the Denpasar Religious Court, Jalan Cokroaminoto Gang Katalia I Denpasar , Thursday, 28/5/2024.
Interestingly, this Divorce Hearing was only attended by one party, namely Juli Artiningsih as the Respondent/Defendant together with Attorney DR. (c) Indra Triantoro, S.H., M.H., from Elice Law Firm. Meanwhile, the Petitioner as Plaintiff, Justin William Hughes bin Rex Clark Hughes, was not present at the divorce divorce case hearing.
As Legal Counsel for Juli Artiningsih, DR. (c) Indra Triantoro, S.H., M.H., from Elice Law Firm stated that
The Divorce Divorce Trial is on the agenda regarding the Plaintiff’s evidence including documentary evidence and witnesses.
“From the existing evidence, legal facts, the Petitioner has proven that there was a living from the beginning of the marriage until 2022,” he explained.
After that, he continued, there was no support for the Respondent, Juli Artiningsih, as a result, the legal facts were very clear, that all this time the Petitioner as Plaintiff had neglected the Respondent Juli Artiningsih.
“Apart from that, it is also a legal fact from the existing evidence and witness statements that it is considered a capable person, that the Petitioner works as a ship captain in Australia,” he said.
For this reason, he should have been able to finance or provide for Respondent Juli Artiningsih, but in fact he has not been provided for until now.
Regarding the testimony of the Petitioner’s witnesses, including religious explanations and so on, this cannot be proven.
“It’s just from hearing what he said and so on, so it should be put aside,” he explained.
As the Respondent’s Attorney, Indra Triantoro stated
there are two goals to be achieved,
“Regarding quarrels, fights and so on, these were caused by the Petitioner himself, not by Respondent Juli Artiningsih.
“If we are still forced to separate, we should provide support,” he explained.
This is because Nafkah Ida, Nafkah Mud’ah and Madiah must be granted. Bearing in mind, the witness statements and documentary evidence submitted by the Petitioner are very clear that the principal of the Petitioner is a capable person.
Furthermore, regarding proof of letters and proof of transfer, it is said that the average is above 30 million rupiah from 2019 to 2022, so there is Past Income that was not given, which should have been given to Respondent Juli Artiningsih, because she felt disadvantaged.
“Because there is a request related to Divorce and Divorce, we as Juli Artiningsih’s legal representatives are making efforts to file an opposition lawsuit or counterclaim,” he added.
One of them, Madiah’s livelihood for more or less two years, if averaged from IDR 35 million per month times 24 months, so it could reach hundreds of millions of rupiah.
“That is also Ida’s living and Madiah’s living. Meanwhile, Mud’ah’s living must be given, because giving as a gift to a divorced wife should be given,” he stressed.
Because the person who initiated the separation was the Petitioner himself, as confirmed by the witness’s statement.
“The witness was visited by the TNI on orders from Mrs. Juli because the witness gave a statement or part of giving ideas and so on, so that the Petitioner and Respondent separated. From this statement the witness automatically admitted that there was a dispute because of a third party, one of which was an employee “I myself was a witness,” he added.
However, the divorce divorce case trial will be held again, next week, June 11 2024 to be precise.
“We will also prove it, we will submit documentary evidence, in the letter there is evidence regarding the transfer until when he provides support,” he explained.
“The facts at the trial will be part of the legal considerations by the Panel of Judges,” he concluded.
Report: Benthar
